- Expand the base to include more services with a focus on those that are mostly used by consumers and are not easy to obtain outside of the DC area or online, such as health clubs and car washes.
- Add a use tax line to the personal income tax form (like many states already do).
- Raise the rate from 5.75% to 6% (to match the rate in neighboring Virginia and Maryland).
There were also specific sales tax changes not recommended:
- Increasing the tax rate on parking, hotels and meals.
- Expanding the base to include more goods, such as snacks (deemed "not worth the administrative challenges" doing so would create).
- Adding an "Amazon" or affiliate nexus provision.
That was May. In July, passage of DC's Fiscal Year 2015 budget included several of the changes including expanding the base to include the following services, effective October 1, 2014 (OTR Notice: 2014-09; 8/29/14):
- Bottled water delivery
- Bowling alley and billiard parlor
- Car washing
- Carpet and upholstery cleaning
- Health club (stories in the press referred to this as the "yoga tax" (see, for example, the Washington Post, 6/24/14))
- Storage of household goods
A service mentioned by the reform commission, but not included in the legislation is beautician services. That seems odd given that most people won't travel too far to get a hair cut.
Is DC's base broadening to include some services good tax policy? I say yes. Consider the following:
- Administration and compliance - most of the newly taxed services are offered by businesses that also sell tangible personal property so they are already complying with the sales tax law. Expanding the base to include services should make it all easier - just charge sales tax on the entire amount charged to the customer.
- Simplicity - while most of the services are clear - tanning and bowling for example, that is not true for storage of household goods. How does the owner of a storage facility know what you are storing? There might also be some evasion if some people run the cost of storage of personal items through a business they own.
- Equity - broadening the base of a consumption tax beyond tangible personal property will make the tax more equitable. For example, why must you pay sales tax on an exercise video or stationary bike, but not on an exercise class or gym membership? Yet, lowering the rate while broadening the base would be more equitable (DC kept the rate the same). The DC legislation uses some of the new tax dollars to reduce the individual income tax. I think it would be better to reduce the sales tax given that it is the regressive tax. Or perhaps they could have done both.
DC also did something we don't see too often. A tax reform commission was formed, it studied the issues, made recommendations and issued a report. Then, it was acted upon rather than just put on a shelf to collect dust! Impressive! The report includes other tax changes and the rationale - it's a good read.
What do you think?
Other recent “Sales Tax Policy - Tales & Trends” posts by Annette Nellen, CPA, ESQ:
- With Sales Tax Software, Are Sales Tax Discounts Still Appropriate?
- Idaho Keeps Sales Tax On Groceries
- Sales Tax Policy Outlook for 2017
- Would Broader Sales Tax Base Deliver Simplification - and Savings?
- Trailing Nexus - When Does It End?